TRANSFORM
A series of transformations are applied to the Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) database to align process performance and technology market shares with the outputs from the Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) scenario.
Biomass
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("biomass")
Regional biomass markets
premise creates regional markets for biomass which is meant to be used as fuel in biomass-fired powerplants or heat generators. Originally in ecoinvent, the biomass being supplied to biomass-fired powerplants is “purpose grown” biomass that originate forestry activities (called “market for wood chips” in ecoinvent). While this type of biomass is suitable for such purpose, it is considered a co-product of the forestry activity, and bears a share of the environmental burden of the process it originates from (notably the land footprint, emissions, potential use of chemicals, etc.).
However, not all the biomass projected to be used in IAM scenarios is “purpose grown”. In fact, significant shares are expected to originate from forestry residues. In such cases, the environmental burden of the forestry activity is entirely allocated to the determining product (e.g., timber), not to the residue, which comes “free of burden”.
Hence, premise creates average regional markets for biomass, which represents the average shares of “purpose grown” and “residual” biomass being fed to biomass-fired powerplants.
The following market is created for each IAM region:
market name
location
market for biomass, used as fuel
all IAM regions
inside of which, the shares of “purpose grown” and “residual” biomass is represented by the following activities:
name in premise |
name in REMIND |
name in IMAGE |
name in LCI database |
---|---|---|---|
biomass - purpose grown |
SE|Electricity|Biomass|Energy Crops |
Primary Energy|Biomass|Energy Crops |
market for wood chips |
biomass - residual |
SE|Electricity|Biomass|Residues |
Primary Energy|Biomass|Residues |
supply of forest residue |
The sum of those shares equal 1. The activity “supply of forest residue” includes the energy, embodied biogenic CO2, transport and associated emissions to chip the residual biomass and transport it to the powerplant, but no other forestry-related burden is included.
Note
You can check the share of residual biomass used for power generation assumed in your scenarios by generating a scenario summary report.
Note
When running premise with the consequential method, the biomass market is only composed of purpose-grown biomass. This is because the residual biomass cannot be considered a marginal supplier for an increase in demand for biomass.
ndb.generate_scenario_report()
Power generation
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("electricity")
The energy conversion efficiency of power plant datasets for specific technologies is adjusted to align with the efficiency changes indicated by the IAM scenario. Two approaches are posisble: * application of a scaling factor to the inputs of the dataset relative to the current efficiency * application of a scaling factor to the inputs of the dataset to match the absolute efficiency given by the IAM scenario
The first approach (default) preserves
Combustion-based powerplants
First, premise adjust the efficiency of coal- and lignite-fired power plants on the basis of the excellent work done by Oberschelp et al. (2019), to update some datasets in ecoinvent, which are, for some of them, several decades old. More specifically, the data provides plant-specific efficiency and emissions factors. We average them by country and fuel type to obtain volume-weighted factors. The efficiency of the following datasets is updated:
electricity production, hard coal
electricity production, lignite
heat and power co-generation, hard coal
heat and power co-generation, lignite
The data from Oberschelp et al. (2019) also allows us to update emissions of SO2, NOx, CH4, and PMs.
Second, premise iterates through coal, lignite, natural gas, biogas, and wood-fired power plant datasets in the LCI database to calculate their current efficiency (i.e., the ratio between the primary fuel energy entering the process and the output energy produced, which is often 1 kWh). If the IAM scenario anticipates a change in efficiency for these processes, the inputs of the datasets are scaled up or down by the scaling factor to effectively reflect a change in fuel input per kWh produced.
The origin of this scaling factor is the IAM scenario selected.
To calculate the old and new efficiency of the dataset, it is necessary to know the net calorific content of the fuel. The table below shows the Lower Heating Value for the different fuels used in combustion-based power plants.
name of fuel
LHV [MJ/kg, as received]
hard coal
26.7
lignite
11.2
petroleum coke
31.3
wood pellet
16.2
wood chips
18.9
natural gas
45
gas, natural, in ground
45
refinery gas
50.3
propane
46.46
heavy fuel oil
38.5
oil, crude, in ground
38.5
light fuel oil
42.6
biogas
22.73
biomethane
47.5
waste
14
methane, fossil
47.5
methane, biogenic
47.5
methane, synthetic
47.5
diesel
43
gasoline
42.6
petrol, 5% ethanol
41.7
petrol, synthetic, hydrogen
42.6
petrol, synthetic, coal
42.6
diesel, synthetic, hydrogen
43
diesel, synthetic, coal
43
diesel, synthetic, wood
43
diesel, synthetic, wood, with CCS
43
diesel, synthetic, grass
43
diesel, synthetic, grass, with CCS
43
hydrogen, petroleum
120
hydrogen, electrolysis
120
hydrogen, biomass
120
hydrogen, biomass, with CCS
120
hydrogen, coal
120
hydrogen, from natural gas
120
hydrogen, from natural gas, with CCS
120
hydrogen, biogas
120
hydrogen, biogas, with CCS
120
hydrogen
120
biodiesel, oil
38
biodiesel, oil, with CCS
38
bioethanol, wood
26.5
bioethanol, wood, with CCS
26.5
bioethanol, grass
26.5
bioethanol, grass, with CCS
26.5
bioethanol, grain
26.5
bioethanol, grain, with CCS
26.5
bioethanol, sugar
26.5
bioethanol, sugar, with CCS
26.5
ethanol
26.5
methanol, wood
19.9
methanol, grass
19.9
methanol, wood, with CCS
19.9
methanol, grass, with CCS
19.9
liquified petroleum gas, natural
45.5
liquified petroleum gas, synthetic
45.5
uranium, enriched 3.8%, in fuel element for light water reactor
4199040
nuclear fuel element, for boiling water reactor, uo2 3.8%
4147200
nuclear fuel element, for boiling water reactor, uo2 4.0%
4147200
nuclear fuel element, for pressure water reactor, uo2 3.8%
4579200
nuclear fuel element, for pressure water reactor, uo2 4.0%
4579200
nuclear fuel element, for pressure water reactor, uo2 4.2%
4579200
uranium hexafluoride
709166
enriched uranium, 4.2%
4579200
mox fuel element
4579200
heat, from hard coal
1
heat, from lignite
1
heat, from petroleum coke
1
heat, from wood pellet
1
heat, from natural gas, high pressure
1
heat, from natural gas, low pressure
1
heat, from heavy fuel oil
1
heat, from light fuel oil
1
heat, from biogas
1
heat, from waste
1
heat, from methane, fossil
1
heat, from methane, biogenic
1
heat, from diesel
1
heat, from gasoline
1
heat, from bioethanol
1
heat, from biodiesel
1
heat, from liquified petroleum gas, natural
1
heat, from liquified petroleum gas, synthetic
1
bagasse, from sugarcane
15.4
bagasse, from sweet sorghum
13.8
sweet sorghum stem
4.45
cottonseed
21.97
flax husks
21.5
coconut husk
20
sugar beet pulp
5.11
cleft timber
14.46
rape meal
31.1
molasse, from sugar beet
16.65
sugar beet
4.1
barkey grain
19.49
rye grain
12
sugarcane
5.3
palm date
10.8
whey
1.28
straw
15.5
grass
17
manure, liquid
0.875
manure, solid
3.6
kerosene, from petroleum
43
kerosene, synthetic, from electrolysis, energy allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from electrolysis, economic allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from coal, energy allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from coal, economic allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from natural gas, energy allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from natural gas, economic allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from biomethane, energy allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from biomethane, economic allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from biomass, energy allocation
43
kerosene, synthetic, from biomass, economic allocation
43
Additionally, the biogenic and fossil CO2 emissions of the datasets are also scaled up or down by the same factor, as they are proportional to the amount of fuel used.
Below is an example of a natural gas power plant with a current (2020) conversion efficiency of 77%. If the IAM scenario indicates a scaling factor of 1.03 in 2030, this suggests that the efficiency increases by 3% relative to the current level. As shown in the table below, this would result in a new efficiency of 79%, where all inputs, as well as CO2 emissions outputs, are re-scaled by 1/1.03 (=0.97).
While non-CO2 emissions (e.g., CO) are reduced because of the reduction in fuel consumption, the emission factor per energy unit remains the same (i.e., gCO/MJ natural gas)). It can be re-scaled using the .update(“emissions”) function, which updates emission factors according to GAINS projections.
electricity production, natura gas, conventional
before
after
unit
electricity production
1
1
kWh
natural gas
0.1040
0.1010
m3
water
0.0200
0.0194
m3
powerplant construction
1.00E-08
9.71E-09
unit
CO2, fossil
0.0059
0.0057
kg
CO, fossil
5.87E-06
5.42E-03
kg
fuel-to-electricity efficiency
77%
79%
%
premise has a couple of rules regarding projected scaling factors:
scaling factors inferior to 1 beyond 2020 are not accepted and are treated as 1.
scaling factors superior to 1 before 2020 are not accepted and are treated as 1.
efficiency can only improve over time.
This is to prevent degrading the performance of a technology in the future, or improving its performance in the past, relative to today.
Note
You can check the efficiencies assumed in your scenarios by generating a scenario summary report, or a report of changes. They are automatically generated after each database export, but you can also generate them manually:
ndb.generate_scenario_report()
ndb.generate_change_report()
Photovoltaics panels
Photovoltaic panels are expected to improve over time. The following module efficiencies are considered for the different types of PV panels:
% module efficiency
micro-Si
single-Si
multi-Si
CIGS
CIS
CdTe
2010
10
15.1
14
11
11
10
2020
11.9
17.9
16.8
14
14
16.8
2050
12.5
26.7
24.4
23.4
23.4
21
The sources for these efficiencies are given in the inventory file LCI_PV:
Given a scenario year, premise iterates through the different PV panel installation datasets to update their efficiency accordingly. To do so, the required surface of panel (in m2) per kW of capacity is adjusted down (or up, if the efficiency is lower than current).
To calculate the current efficiency of a PV installation, premise assumes a solar irradiation of 1000 W/m2. Hence, the current efficiency is calculated as:
current_eff [%] = installation_power [W] / (panel_surface [m2] * 1000 [W/m2])
The scaling factor is calculated as:
scaling_factor = current_eff / new_eff
The required surface of PV panel in the dataset is then adjusted like so:
new_surface = current_surface * (1 / scaling_factor)
For scenario years beyond 2050, 2050 efficiency values are used.
The table below provides such an example where a 450 kWp flat-roof installation sees its current (2020) module efficiency improving from 20% to 26% by 2050. THe are of PV panel (and mounting system) has been multiplied by 1 / (0.26/0.20), all other inputs remaining unchanged.
450kWp flat roof installation
before
after
unit
photovoltaic flat-roof installation, 450 kWp, single-SI, on roof
1
1
unit
inverter production, 500 kW
1.5
1.5
unit
photovoltaic mounting system, …
2300
1731
m2
photovoltaic panel, single-SI
2500
1881
m2
treatment, single-SI PV module
30000
30000
kg
electricity, low voltage
25
25
kWh
module efficiency
20%
26%
%
Markets
premise creates additional datasets that represent the average supply and production pathway for a given commodity for a given scenario, year and region.
Such datasets are called regional markets. Hence, a regional market for high voltage electricity contains the different technologies that supply electricity at high voltage in a given IAM region, in proportion to their respective production volumes.
Regional electricity markets
premise creates high, medium and low-voltage electricity markets for each IAM region. It starts by creating high-voltage markets and define the share of each supplying technology by their respective production volumes in respect to the total volume produced.
High voltage supplying technologies are all technologies besides:
residential (<=3kWp) photovoltaic power (low voltage)
waste incineration co-generating powerplants (medium voltage)
Several datasets can qualify for a given technology, in a given IAM region. To define to which extent a given dataset should be supplying in the market, premise uses the current production volume of the dataset.
For example, if coal-fired powerplants are to supply 25% of the high voltage electricity in the IAM region “Europe”, premise fetches the production volumes of all coal-fired powerplants which ecoinvent location is included in the IAM region “Europe” (e.g., DE, PL, LT, etc.), and allocates to each of those a supply share based on their respective production volume in respect to the total production volume of coal-fired powerplants.
For example, the table below shows the contribution of biomass-fired CHP powerplants in the regional high voltage electricity market for IMAGE’s “WEU” region (Western Europe). The biomass CHP technology represents 2.46% of the supply mix. Biomass CHP datasets included in the region “WEU” are given a supply share corresponding to their respective current production volumes.
energy type
Supplier name
Supplier location
Contribution within energy type
Final contribution
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
FR
3.80%
0.09%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
AT
2.87%
0.07%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
NO
0.06%
0.00%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
FI
7.65%
0.19%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
SE
9.04%
0.22%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
IT
8.27%
0.20%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
BE
4.59%
0.11%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
DE
12.53%
0.31%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
LU
0.05%
0.00%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
DK
6.60%
0.16%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
GR
0.01%
0.00%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
CH
1.81%
0.04%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
ES
5.10%
0.13%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
PT
1.34%
0.03%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
IE
0.77%
0.02%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
NL
2.32%
0.06%
Biomass CHP
heat and power co-generation, wood chips
GB
33.18%
0.81%
_
_
Sum
100.00%
2.46%
Transformation losses are added to the high-voltage market datasets. Transformation losses are the result of weighting country-specific high voltage losses (provided by ecoinvent) of countries included in the IAM region with their respective current production volumes (also provided by ecoinvent). This is not ideal as it supposes that future country-specific production volumes will remain the same in respect to one another.
Storage
If the IAM scenario requires the use of storage, premise adds a storage dataset to the high voltage market. premise can add two types of storage:
storage via a large-scale flow battery (electricity supply, high voltage, from vanadium-redox flow battery system)
storage via the conversion of electricity to hydrogen and subsequent use in a gas turbine (electricity production, from hydrogen-fired one gigawatt gas turbine)
The electricity storage via battery incurs a 33% loss. It is operated by a 8.3 MWh vanadium redox-based flow battery, with a lifetime of 20 years or 8176 cycle-lifes (i.e., 49,000 MWh).
The storage of electricity via hydrogen is done in two steps: first, the electricity is converted to hydrogen via a 1MW PEM electrolyser, with an efficiency of 62%. The hydrogen is then stored in a geological cavity and used in a gas turbine, with an efficiency of 51%. Accounting for leakages and losses, the overall efficiency of the process is about 37% (i.e., 2.7 kWh necessary to deliver 1 kWh to the grid).
The efficiency of the H2-fed gas turbine is based on the parameters of Ozawa et al. (2019).
The workflow is not too different from that of high voltage markets. There are however only two possible providers of electricity in medium voltage markets: the high voltage market, as well as waste incineration powerplants.
High-to-medium transformation losses are added as an input of the medium voltage market to itself. Distribution losses are modelled the same way as for high voltage markets and are added to the input from high voltage market.
Low voltage regional markets receive an input from the medium voltage market, as well as from residential photovoltaic power.
Medium-to-low transformation losses are added as an input from the low voltage market to itself. Distribution losses are modelled the same way as for high and medium voltage markets, and are added to the input from the medium voltage market.
The table below shows the example of a low voltage market for the IAM IMAGE regional “WEU”.
supplier
amount
unit
location
description
market group for electricity, medium voltage
1.023880481
kilowatt hour
WEU
input from medium voltage + distribution losses
market group for electricity, low voltage
0.025538286
kilowatt hour
WEU
transformation losses (2.55%)
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
0.00035691
kilowatt hour
DE
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
0.000143875
kilowatt hour
IT
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
9.38E-05
kilowatt hour
ES
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
9.03E-05
kilowatt hour
GB
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
7.82E-05
kilowatt hour
FR
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
6.80E-05
kilowatt hour
NL
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
3.76E-05
kilowatt hour
BE
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
2.16E-05
kilowatt hour
GR
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
2.08E-05
kilowatt hour
CH
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
1.48E-05
kilowatt hour
AT
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
9.44E-06
kilowatt hour
SE
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
8.66E-06
kilowatt hour
DK
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
6.83E-06
kilowatt hour
PT
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
2.60E-06
kilowatt hour
FI
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
1.30E-06
kilowatt hour
LU
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
1.01E-06
kilowatt hour
NO
electricity production, photovoltaic, residential
2.40E-07
kilowatt hour
IE
distribution network construction, electricity, low voltage
8.74E-08
kilometer
RoW
market for sulfur hexafluoride, liquid
2.99E-09
kilogram
RoW
sulfur hexafluoride
2.99E-09
kilogram
transformer emissions
Note
You can check the electricity supply mixes assumed in your scenarios by generating a scenario summary report.
ndb.generate_scenario_report()
Long-term regional electricity markets
Long-term (i.e., 20, 40 and 60 years) regional markets are created for modelling the lifetime-weighted burden associated to electricity supply for systems that have a long lifetime (e.g., battery electric vehicles, buildings).
These long-term markets contain a period-weighted electricity supply mix. For example, if the scenario year is 2030 and the period considered is 20 years, the supply mix represents the supply mixes between 2030 and 2050, with an equal weight given to each year.
The rest of the modelling is similar to that of regular regional electricity markets described above.
Market datasets originally present in the ecoinvent LCI database are cleared from any inputs. Instead, an input from the newly created regional market is added, depending on the location of the dataset.
The table below shows the example of the low voltage electricity market for Great Britain, which now only includes an input from the “WEU” regional market, which “includes” it in terms of geography.
Output
_
_
_
producer
amount
unit
location
market for electricity, low voltage
1.00E+00
kilowatt hour
GB
Input
_
_
_
supplier
amount
unit
location
market group for electricity, low voltage
1.00E+00
kilowatt hour
WEU
Once the new markets are created, premise re-links all electricity-consuming activities to the new regional markets. The regional market it re-links to depends on the location of the consumer.
Cement production
The modelling of future improvements in the cement sector is relatively simple at the moment, and does not involve the emergence of new technologies (e.g., electric kilns).
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("cement")
premise duplicates clinker production datasets in ecoinvent (called “clinker production”) so as to create a proxy dataset for each IAM region. The location of the proxy datasets used for a given IAM region is a location included in the IAM region. If no valid dataset is found, premise resorts to using a rest-of-the-world (RoW) dataset to represent the IAM region.
premise changes the location of these duplicated datasets and fill in different fields, such as that of production volume.
premise then adjusts the thermal efficiency of the process. It does so by calculating the technology-weighted energy requirements per ton of clinker. Based on GNR/IEA roadmap data, premise uses:
- the share of kiln technology for a given region today (2020):
wet,
dry,
dry with pre-heater,
and dry with pre-heater and pre-calciner
the energy requirement for each of these technologies today (2020).
Once the energy required per ton clinker today (2020) is known, it is multiplied by a scaling factor that represents a change in efficiency between today and the scenario year.
Note
You can check the efficiency gains assumed relative to 2020 in your scenarios by generating a scenario summary report.
ndb.generate_scenario_report()
Note
premise enforces a lower limit on the fuel consumption per ton of clinker. This limit is set to 2.8 GJ/t clinker and corresponds to the minimum theoretical fuel consumption with an moisture content of the raw materials, as considered in the 2018 IEA cement roadmap report. Hence, regardless of the scaling factor, the fuel consumption per ton of clinker will never be less than 2.8 GJ/t.
Once the new energy input is determined, premise scales down the fuel, and the fossil and biogenic CO2 emissions accordingly, based on the Lower Heating Value and CO2 emission factors for these fuels.
Note that the change in CO2 emissions only concerns the share that originates from the combustion of fuels. It does not concern the calcination emissions due to the production of calcium oxide (CaO) from calcium carbonate (CaCO3), which is set at a fix emission rate of 525 kg CO2/t clinker.
If the IAM scenario indicates that a share of the CO2 emissions for the cement sector in a given region and year is sequestered and stored, premise adds CCS to the corresponding clinker production dataset.
The CCS dataset used to that effect is from Meunier et al., 2020. The dataset described the capture of CO2 from a cement plant. To that dataset, premise adds another dataset that models the storage of the CO2 underground, from Volkart et al, 2013.
Besides electricity, the CCS process requires heat, water and others inputs to regenerate the amine-based sorbent. We use two data points to approximate the heat requirement: 3.66 MJ/kg CO2 captured in 2020, and 2.6 MJ/kg in 2050. The first number is from Meunier et al., 2020, while the second number is described as the best-performing pilot project today, according to the 2022 review of pilot projects by the Global CCS Institute. It is further assumed that the heat requirement is fulfilled to an extent of 15% by the recovery of excess heat, as mentioned in the 2018 IEA cement roadmap report.
Note
You can check the the carbon capture rate for cement production assumed in your scenarios by generating a scenario summary report.
ndb.generate_scenario_report()
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("cement")
When clinker production datasets are created for each IAM region, premise duplicates cement production datasets for each IAM region as well. These cement production datasets link the newly created clinker production dataset, corresponding to their IAM region.
premise used to modify the composition of cement markets to reflect a lower clinker content over time, based on external projections. This is no longer performed, as it is not an assumption stemming from the IAM model, but rather a projection of the cement industry.
Market datasets originally present in the ecoinvent LCI database are cleared from any inputs. Instead, an input from the newly created regional market is added, depending on the location of the dataset.
The table below shows the example of the clinker market for South Africa, which now only includes an input from the “SAF” regional market, which “includes” it in terms of geography.
Output
_
_
_
producer
amount
unit
location
market for clinker
1.00E+00
kilogram
ZA
Input
_
_
_
supplier
amount
unit
location
market for clinker
1.00E+00
kilogram
*SAF
Once cement production and market datasets are created, premise re-links cement-consuming activities to the new regional markets for cement. The regional market it re-links to depends on the location of the consumer.
Steel production
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("steel")"
The modelling of future improvements in the steel sector is relatively simple at the moment, and does not involve the emergence of new technologies (e.g., hydrogen-based DRI, electro-winning).
premise duplicates steel production datasets in ecoinvent for the production of primary and secondary steel (called respectively “steel production, converter” and “steel production, electric”) so as to create a proxy dataset for each IAM region.
The location of the proxy datasets used for a given IAM region is a location included in the IAM region. If no valid dataset is found, premise resorts to using a rest-of-the-world (RoW) dataset to represent the IAM region.
premise changes the location of these duplicated datasets and fill in different fields, such as that of production volume.
Regarding primary steel production (using BO-BOF), premise adjusts the inputs of fuels found in:
the pig iron production datasets,
the steel production datasets,
assuming an integrated steel mill unit, by multiplying these fuel inputs by a scaling factor provided by the IAM scenario.
Typical fuel inputs for these process are natural gas, coal, coal-based coke. Emissions of (fossil) CO2 are scaled accordingly.
Regarding the production of secondary steel (using EAF), premise adjusts the input of electricity based on the scaling factor provided by the IAM scenario.
Note
You can check the efficiency gains assumed relative to 2020 for steel production in your scenarios by generating a scenario summary report.
ndb.generate_scenario_report()
Warning
If your system of interest relies heavily on the provision of steel, you should probably consider modelling steel production based on primary data. ecoinvent datasets for steel production rely on a few data points, which are then further process transformed by premise. Therefore, there is a large modelling uncertainty.
If the IAM scenario indicates that a share of the CO2 emissions from the steel sector in a given region and year is sequestered and stored, premise adds a corresponding input from a CCS dataset. The datatset used to that effect is from Meunier et al., 2020. The dataset described the capture of CO2 from a cement plant, not a steel mill, but it is assumed to be an acceptable approximation since the CO2 concentration in the flue gases should not be significantly different.
To that dataset, premise adds another dataset that models the storage of the CO2 underground, from Volkart et al, 2013.
Besides electricity, the CCS process requires heat, water and others inputs to regenerate the amine-based sorbent. We use two data points to approximate the heat requirement: 3.66 MJ/kg CO2 captured in 2020, and 2.6 MJ/kg in 2050. The first number is from Meunier et al., 2020, while the second number is described as the best-performing pilot project today, according to the 2022 review of pilot projects by the Global CCS Institute. It is further assumed that the heat requirement is fulfilled to an extent of 15% by the recovery of excess heat, as mentioned in the 2018 IEA cement roadmap report, which is assumed to be also valid in the case of a steel mill.
premise create a dataset “market for steel, low-alloyed” for each IAM region. Within each dataset, the supply shares of primary and secondary steel are adjusted to reflect the projections from the IAM scenario, for a given region and year, based on the variables below.
name in premise
name in REMIND
name in IMAGE
name in LCI database
steel - primary
Production|Industry|Steel|Primary
Production|Steel|Primary
steel production, converter
steel - secondary
Production|Industry|Steel|Secondary
Production|Steel|Secondary
steel production, electric
The table below shows an example of the market for India, where 66% of the steel comes from an oxygen converter process (primary steel), while 34% comes from an electric arc furnace process (secondary steel).
Output
_
_
_
producer
amount
unit
location
market for steel, low-alloyed
1
kilogram
IND
Input
supplier
amount
unit
location
market group for transport, freight, inland waterways, barge
0.5
ton kilometer
GLO
market group for transport, freight train
0.35
ton kilometer
GLO
market for transport, freight, sea, bulk carrier for dry goods
0.38
ton kilometer
GLO
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified, regional delivery
0.12
ton kilometer
IND
steel production, converter, low-alloyed
0.66
kilogram
IND
steel production, electric, low-alloyed
0.34
kilogram
IND
Market datasets originally present in the ecoinvent LCI database are cleared from any inputs. Instead, an input from the newly created regional market is added, depending on the location of the dataset.
The table below shows the example of the clinker market for South Africa, which now only includes an input from the “SAF” regional market, which “includes” it in terms of geography.
Output
_
_
_
producer
amount
unit
location
market for clinker
1.00E+00
kilogram
ZA
Input
_
_
_
supplier
amount
unit
location
market for clinker
1.00E+00
kilogram
SAF
Once steel production and market datasets are created, premise re-links steel-consuming activities to the new regional markets for steel. The regional market it re-links to depends on the location of the consumer.
Transport
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("two_wheelers")
ndb.update("cars")
ndb.update("trucks")
ndb.update("buses")
premise imports inventories for transport activity operated by:
two-wheelers
passenger cars
medium and heavy duty trucks
buses
These inventories are available for the construction year of 2000 to 2050, by steps of 5 years, but premise only imports vehicles with a construction year inferior or equal to the scenario year (vehicle from 2050 will not be imported in a database for the scenario year of 2030, but vehicles from 2020 will, as they are necessary to build the fleet average vehicles).
The following size classes of medium and heavy duty trucks are imported:
3.5t
7.5t
18t
26t
40t
These weights refer to the vehicle gross mass (the maximum weight the vehicle is allowed to reach, fully loaded).
Each truck is available for a variety of powertrain types:
fuel cell electric
battery electric
diesel hybrid
plugin diesel hybrid
diesel
compressed gas
but also for different driving cycles, to which a range autonomy of the vehicle is associated:
urban delivery (required range autonomy of 150 km)
regional delivery (required range autonomy of 400 km)
long haul (required range autonomy of 800 km)
Those are driving cycles developed for the software VECTO, which have become standard in measuring the CO2 emissions of trucks.
The truck vehicle model is from Sacchi et al, 2021.
Note
Not all powertrain types are available for regional and long haul driving cycles. This is specifically the case for battery electric trucks, for which the mass and size prevent them from completing the cycle, or surpasses the vehicle gross weight.
Warning
A consequence of replacing original truck datasets with those provided by premise may be a steep increase in CO2-eq. emissions, especially if the urban driving cycle is chosen. Overall, considering and size classes, diesel truck datasets from ecoinvent have lower fuel consumption and exhaust emissions.
Fleet average trucks
REMIND and IMAGE provide fleet composition data, per scenario, region and year.
The fleet data is expressed in “vehicle-kilometer” performed by each type of vehicle, in a given region and year.
premise uses the following loads to translate the transport demand from “vehicle-kilometers” to “ton-kilometers”, derived from TRACCS:
load [tons]
urban delivery
regional delivery
long haul
3.5t
0.26
0.26
0.8
7.5t
0.52
0.52
1.6
18t
1.35
1.35
4.1
26t
2.05
2.05
6.2
32t
6.1
6.1
9.1
40t
6.1
6.1
9.1
Note
Loads from the TRACCS survey data are representative for EU-28 conditions. premise applies these loads to all IAM regions. Hence, there might be some inconsistency at this level. Also, these loads are much lower than those assumed in original ecoinvent truck datasets.
premise uses the fleet data to produce fleet average trucks for each IAM region, and more specifically:
a fleet average truck, all powertrains and size classes considered
a fleet average truck, all powertrains considered, for a given size class
They appear in the LCI database as the following:
truck transport dataset name
description
transport, freight, lorry, 3.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, long haul
fleet average, for 3.5t size class, long haul cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 3.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, regional delivery
fleet average, for 3.5t size class, regional delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 3.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, urban delivery
fleet average, for 3.5t size class, urban delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 7.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, long haul
fleet average, for 7.5t size class, long haul cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 7.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, regional delivery
fleet average, for 7.5t size class, regional delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 7.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, urban delivery
fleet average, for 7.5t size class, urban delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 18t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, long haul
fleet average, for 18t size class, long haul cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 18t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, regional delivery
fleet average, for 18t size class, regional delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 18t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, urban delivery
fleet average, for 18t size class, urban delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, long haul
fleet average, for 26t size class, long haul cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, regional delivery
fleet average, for 26t size class, regional delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, urban delivery
fleet average, for 26t size class, urban delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 40t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, long haul
fleet average, for 26t size class, long haul cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 40t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, regional delivery
fleet average, for 26t size class, regional delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, 40t gross weight, unspecified powertrain, urban delivery
fleet average, for 26t size class, urban delivery cycle
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified, long haul
fleet average, all powertrain types, all size classes
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified, regional delivery
fleet average, all powertrain types, all size classes
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified, urban delivery
fleet average, all powertrain types, all size classes
Relinking
Regarding trucks, premise re-links truck transport-consuming activities to the newly created fleet average truck datasets.
The following table shows the correspondence between the original truck transport datasets and the new ones replacing them:
Original dataset
Replaced by (REMIND)
Replaced by (IMAGE)
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry 16-32 metric ton
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry 28 metric ton, fatty acid methyl ester 100%
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry 3.5-7.5 metric ton
transport, freight, lorry, 3.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry 7.5-16 metric ton
transport, freight, lorry, 7.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry >32 metric ton
transport, freight, lorry, 40t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry, 40t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry with reefer, cooling
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry with reefer, freezing
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry with refrigeration machine, 3.5-7.5 ton
transport, freight, lorry, 3.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry with refrigeration machine, 7.5-16 ton
transport, freight, lorry, 7.5t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry, 26t gross weight, unspecified powertrain
transport, freight, lorry with refrigeration machine, cooling
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry with refrigeration machine, freezing
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified
Note that IMAGE fleet data only uses 26t and 40t trucks.
Additionally, premise iterates through each truck transport-consuming activities to calculate the driving distance required. When the reference unit of the dataset is 1 kilogram, the distance driven by truck can easily be inferred. Indeed, for example, 0.56 tkm of truck transport for 1 kg of flour indicates that the flour has been transported over 560 km.
On this basis, premise chooses one of the following driving cycles:
regional delivery, if the distance is inferior or equal to 450 km
long haul, if the distance is superior to 450 km
Hence, in the following dataset for “market for steel, low-alloyed” for the IAM region of India, premise chose the regional delivery driving cycle since the kilogram of steel has been transported on average over 120 km by truck. The truck used to transport that kilogram of steel is a fleet average vehicle built upon the REMIND fleet data for the region of India.
Output
_
_
_
producer
amount
unit
location
market for steel, low-alloyed
1
kilogram
IND
Input
supplier
amount
unit
location
market group for transport, freight, inland waterways, barge
0.5
ton kilometer
GLO
market group for transport, freight train
0.35
ton kilometer
GLO
market for transport, freight, sea, bulk carrier for dry goods
0.38
ton kilometer
GLO
transport, freight, lorry, unspecified, regional delivery
0.12
ton kilometer
IND
steel production, converter, low-alloyed
0.66
kilogram
IND
steel production, electric, low-alloyed
0.34
kilogram
IND
Direct Air Capture
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("dac")
premise creates different region-specific Direct Air Capture (DAC) datasets, based on the inventories from Qiu et al., 2022.
If provided by the IAM scenario, premise scales the inputs of electricity and heat of the DAC datasets to reflect changes in efficiency.
Fuels
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("fuels")
premise create different region-specific fuel supply chains and fuel markets, based on data from the IAM scenario.
The biomass-to-fuel efficiency ratio of bioethanol and biodiesel production datasets is adjusted according to the IAM scenario projections.
Inputs to the biofuel production datasets are multiplied by a scaling factor that represents the change in efficiency relative to today (2020).
Several pathways for hydrogen production are modeled in premise:
electrolysis
steam methane reforming of natural gas
steam methane reforming of biomethane
gasification of coal
gasification of woody biomass
The last four pathways are modeled with and without CCS.
Inventories for these pathways are available under:
premise/data/additional_inventories/lci-hydrogen-electrolysis.xlsx
premise/data/additional_inventories/lci-smr-atr-natgas.xlsx
premise/data/additional_inventories/lci-smr-atr-biogas.xlsx
premise/data/additional_inventories/lci-hydrogen-coal-gasification.xlsx
premise/data/additional_inventories/lci-hydrogen-wood-gasification.xlsx
In case the IAM variable that relates to a given hydrogen pathway’s efficiency is not available, the process’ efficiency is not modified, with the exception of electrolysis, which is modified regardless.
A scaling factor is calculated for each pathway, which is the ratio between the IAM variable value for the year in question and the current efficiency value (i.e., in 2020). premise uses this scaling factor to adjust the amount of feedstock input to produce 1 kg of hydrogen (e.g., m3 of natural gas per kg hydrogen).
If the IAM variable that relates to the efficiency of the electrolysis hydrogen process is not available, premise adjusts the amount of electricity needed to produce 1 kg of hydrogen by electrolysis, on the basis of the following requirements, which are sourced from Bauer et al, 2022:
kWh/kg H2, 25 bar
2010
2020
2050
electricity
58
55
44
When building a database using IMAGE, land use and land use change emissions are available. Upon the import of crops farming datasets, premise adjusts the land occupation as well as CO2 emissions associated to land use and land use change, respectively.
Output
_
_
_
producer
amount
unit
location
Farming and supply of corn
1
kilogram
CEU
Input
supplier
amount
unit
location
market for diesel, burned in agricultural machinery
0.142
megajoule
GLO
petrol, unleaded, burned in machinery
0.042
megajoule
GLO
market for natural gas, burned in gas motor, for storage
0.091
megajoule
GLO
market group for electricity, low voltage
0.004
kilowatt hour
CEU
Energy, gross calorific value, in biomass
15.910
megajoule
_
Occupation, annual crop
1.584
square meter-year
_
Carbon dioxide, in air
1.476
kilogram
_
Carbon dioxide, from soil or biomass stock
1.140
kilogram
_
The land use value is given from the IAM scenario in Ha/GJ of primary crop energy. Hence, the land occupation per kg of crop farmed is calculated as:
land_use = land_use [Ha/GJ] * 10000 [m2/Ha] / 1000 [MJ/GJ] * LHV [MJ/kg]
Regarding land use change CO2 emissions, the principle is similar. The variable is expressed in kg CO2/GJ of primary crop energy. Hence, the land use change CO2 emissions per kg of crop farmed are calculated as:
land_use_co2 = land_use_co2 [kg CO2/GJ] / 1000 [MJ/GJ] * LHV [MJ/kg]
premise builds several supply chains for synthetic fuels, for each IAM region. THe reason for this is that synthetic fuels can be produced from a variety of hydrogen and CO2 sources. Additionally, hydrogen can be supplied by different means of transport, and in different states.
premise starts by building different supply chains for hydrogen by varying:
the transport mode: truck, hydrogen pipeline, re-assigned CNG pipeline, ship,
the distance: 500 km, 2000 km
the state of the hydrogen: gaseous, liquid, liquid organic compound,
the hydrogen production route: electrolysis, SMR, biomass gasifier (coal, woody biomass)
Hence, for each IAM region, the following supply chains for hydrogen are built:
hydrogen supply, from electrolysis, by ship, as liquid, over 2000 km
hydrogen supply, from gasification of biomass by heatpipe reformer, by H2 pipeline, as gaseous, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from ATR of from natural gas, by truck, as gaseous, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from gasification of biomass by heatpipe reformer, by truck, as liquid organic compound, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from SMR of from natural gas, with CCS, by truck, as liquid organic compound, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from SMR of from natural gas, with CCS, by ship, as liquid, over 2000 km
hydrogen supply, from coal gasification, by CNG pipeline, as gaseous, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from SMR of from natural gas, by ship, as liquid, over 2000 km
hydrogen supply, from coal gasification, by truck, as liquid, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from gasification of biomass by heatpipe reformer, by truck, as liquid, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from ATR of from natural gas, with CCS, by truck, as liquid organic compound, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from SMR of from natural gas, with CCS, by truck, as liquid, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from electrolysis, by truck, as liquid organic compound, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from gasification of biomass, by truck, as liquid organic compound, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from SMR of from natural gas, with CCS, by truck, as gaseous, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from SMR of biogas, with CCS, by CNG pipeline, as gaseous, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from SMR of from natural gas, by truck, as gaseous, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from SMR of from natural gas, by H2 pipeline, as gaseous, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from gasification of biomass, with CCS, by truck, as liquid organic compound, over 500 km
hydrogen supply, from gasification of biomass, by ship, as liquid, over 2000 km
Each supply route is associated with specific losses. Losses for the transport of H2 by truck and hydrogen pipelines, and losses at the regional storage storage (salt cavern) are from Wulf et al, 2018. Boil-off loss values during shipping are from Hank et al, 2020. Losses when transporting H2 via re-assigned CNG pipelines are from Cerniauskas et al, 2020. Losses along the pipeline are from Schori et al, 2012., but to be considered conservative, as those are initially for natural gas (and hydrogen has a higher potential for leaking).
_
_
truck
ship
H2 pipeline
CNG pipeline
reference flow
gaseous
compression
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
per kg H2
_
storage buffer
2.3%
2.3%
per kg H2
_
storage leak
1.0%
1.0%
per kg H2
_
pipeline leak
0.004%
0.004%
per kg H2, per km
_
purification
7.0%
per kg H2
liquid
liquefaction
1.3%
1.3%
per kg H2
_
vaporization
2.0%
2.0%
per kg H2
_
boil-off
0.2%
0.2%
per kg H2, per day
liquid organic compound
hydrogenation
0.5%
per kg H2
Losses are cumulative along the supply chain and range anywhere between 5 and 20%. The table below shows the example of 1 kg of hydrogen transport via re-assigned CNG pipelines, as a gas, over 500 km. A total of 0.13 kg of hydrogen is lost along the supply chain (13% loss):
Output
_
_
_
producer
amount
unit
location
hydrogen supply, from electrolysis, by CNG pipeline, as gaseous, over 500 km
1
kilogram
OCE
Input
supplier
amount
unit
location
hydrogen production, gaseous, 25 bar, from electrolysis
1.133
kilogram
OCE
market group for electricity, low voltage
3.091
kilowatt hour
OCE
market group for electricity, low voltage
0.516
kilowatt hour
OCE
hydrogen embrittlement inhibition
1
kilogram
OCE
geological hydrogen storage
1
kilogram
OCE
Hydrogen refuelling station
1.14E-07
unit
OCE
distribution pipeline for hydrogen, reassigned CNG pipeline
1.56E-08
kilometer
RER
transmission pipeline for hydrogen, reassigned CNG pipeline
1.56E-08
kilometer
RER
7% during the purification of hydrogen: when using CNG pipelines, the hydrogen has to be mixed with another gas to prevent the embrittlement of the pipelines. The separation process at the other end leads to significant losses
2% lost along the 500 km of pipeline
3% at the regional storage (salt cavern)
Also, in this same case, electricity is used:
1.9 kWh to compress the H2 from 25 bar to 100 bar to inject it into the pipeline
1.2 kWh to recompress the H2 along the pipeline every 250 km
0.34 kWh for injecting and pumping H2 into a salt cavern
2.46 kWh to blend the H2 with oxygen on one end, and purify on the other
0.5 kWh to pre-cool the H2 at the fuelling station (necessary if used in fuel cells, for example)
premise builds markets for the following fuels:
market for petrol, unleaded
market for petrol, low-sulfur
market for diesel, low-sulfur
market for diesel
market for natural gas, high pressure
market for hydrogen, gaseous
based on the IAM scenario data regarding the composition of liquid and gaseous secondary energy carriers:
Warning
Some fuel types are not properly represented in the LCI database. Available inventories for biomass-based methanol production do not differentiate between wood and grass as the feedstock.
Note
Modelling choice: premise builds several potential supply chains for hydrogen. Because the logistics to supply hydrogen in the future is not known or indicated by the IAM, the choice is made to supply it by truck over 500 km, in a gaseous state.
Because not all competing fuels of a same type have similar calorific values, some adjustments are made. The table below shows the example of the market for gasoline, for the IMAGE region of Western Europe in 2050. The sum of fuel inputs is superior to 1 (i.e., 1.4 kg). This is because the market dataset as “1 kg” as reference unit, and methanol and bioethanol have low calorific values comparatively to petrol (i.e., 19.9 and 26.5 MJ/kg respectively, vs. 42.6 MJ/kg for gasoline). Hence, their inputs are scaled up to reach an average calorific value of 42.6 MJ/kg of fuel supplied by the market.
This is necessary as gasoline-consuming activities in the lCI database are modelled with the calorific value of conventional gasoline.
Output
_
_
_
producer
amount
unit
location
market for petrol, low-sulfur
1
kilogram
WEU
Input
supplier
amount
unit
location
petrol production, low-sulfur
0.550
kilogram
CH
market for methanol, from biomass
0.169
kilogram
CH
market for methanol, from biomass
0.148
kilogram
CH
market for methanol, from biomass
0.122
kilogram
CH
market for methanol, from biomass
0.122
kilogram
CH
Ethanol production, via fermentation, from switchgrass
0.060
kilogram
WEU
Ethanol production, via fermentation, from switchgrass, with CCS
0.053
kilogram
WEU
Ethanol production, via fermentation, from sugarbeet
0.051
kilogram
WEU
Ethanol production, via fermentation, from sugarbeet, with CCS
0.051
kilogram
WEU
Ethanol production, via fermentation, from poplar, with CCS
0.041
kilogram
WEU
Ethanol production, via fermentation, from poplar
0.041
kilogram
WEU
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("heat")
Datasets that supply heat and steam via the combustion of natural gas and diesel are regionalized (made available for each region of the IAM model) and relinked to regional fuel markets. If the fuel market contains a share of non-fossil fuels, the CO2 emissions of the heat and steam production are split between fossil and non-fossil emissions. Once regionalized, the heat and steam production datasets relink to activities that require heat within the same region.
Here is a list of the heat and steam production datasets that are regionalized:
diesel, burned in …
steam production, as energy carrier, in chemical industry
heat production, natural gas, …
heat and power co-generation, natural gas, …
heat production, light fuel oil, …
heat production, softwood chips from forest, …
heat production, hardwood chips from forest, …
These datasets are relinked to the corresponding regionalized fuel market only if .update(“fuels”) has been run. Also, heat production datasets that use biomass as fuel input (e.g., softwood and hardwood chips) relink to the dataset market for biomass, used as fuel if update(“biomass”) has been run previously.
premise iterates through activities that consume any of the newly created fuel markets to update the way CO2 emissions are modelled. Based on the fuel market composition, CO2 emissions within the fuel-consuming activity are split between fossil and non-fossil emissions.
The table below shows the example where the CO2 emissions of a 3.5t truck have been split into biogenic and fossil fractions after re-link to the new diesel market of the REMIND region for India.
Output
before
after
_
_
producer
amount
amount
unit
location
transport, freight, lorry, diesel, 3.5t
1
1
ton-kilometer
IND
Input
supplier
amount
amount
unit
location
treatment of tyre wear emissions, lorry
-0.0009
-0.0009
kilogram
RER
market for road maintenance
0.0049
0.0049
meter-year
RER
market for road
0.0041
0.0041
meter-year
GLO
treatment of road wear emissions, lorry
-0.0008
-0.0008
kilogram
RER
market for refrigerant R134a
2.84E-05
2.84E-05
kilogram
GLO
treatment of brake wear emissions, lorry
-0.0005
-0.0005
kilogram
RER
Light duty truck, diesel, 3.5t
1.39E-05
1.39E-05
unit
RER
market for diesel, low-sulfur
0.1854
0.1854
kilogram
IND
Carbon dioxide, fossil
0.5840
0.5667
kilogram
_
Carbon dioxide, non-fossil
0.0000
0.0173
kilogram
_
Nitrogen oxides
0.0008
0.0008
kilogram
_
Nitrogen oxides
0.0003
0.0003
kilogram
_
Geographical mapping
IAM models have slightly different geographical resolutions and definitions.
Map of IMAGE regions
Map of REMIND regions
premise uses the following correspondence between ecoinvent locations and IAM regions. This mapping is performed by the constructive_geometries implementation in the wurst library.
ecoinvent location
REMIND region
IMAGE region
AE
MEA
ME
AL
NEU
CEU
AM
REF
RUS
AO
SSA
RSAF
APAC
OAS
SEAS
AR
LAM
RSAM
AT
EUR
WEU
AU
CAZ
OCE
AZ
REF
RUS
BA
NEU
CEU
BD
OAS
RSAS
BE
EUR
WEU
BG
EUR
CEU
BH
MEA
ME
BJ
SSA
WAF
BN
OAS
SEAS
BO
LAM
RSAM
BR
LAM
BRA
BR-AC
LAM
BRA
BR-AL
LAM
BRA
BR-AM
LAM
BRA
BR-AP
LAM
BRA
BR-BA
LAM
BRA
BR-CE
LAM
BRA
BR-DF
LAM
BRA
BR-ES
LAM
BRA
BR-GO
LAM
BRA
BR-MA
LAM
BRA
BR-MG
LAM
BRA
BR-Mid-western grid
LAM
BRA
BR-MS
LAM
BRA
BR-MT
LAM
BRA
BR-North-eastern grid
LAM
BRA
BR-Northern grid
LAM
BRA
BR-PA
LAM
BRA
BR-PB
LAM
BRA
BR-PE
LAM
BRA
BR-PI
LAM
BRA
BR-PR
LAM
BRA
BR-RJ
LAM
BRA
BR-RN
LAM
BRA
BR-RO
LAM
BRA
BR-RR
LAM
BRA
BR-RS
LAM
BRA
BR-SC
LAM
BRA
BR-SE
LAM
BRA
BR-South-eastern grid
LAM
BRA
BR-Southern grid
LAM
BRA
BR-SP
LAM
BRA
BR-TO
LAM
BRA
BW
SSA
RSAF
BY
REF
UKR
CA
CAZ
CAN
CA-AB
CAZ
CAN
CA-BC
CAZ
CAN
CA-MB
CAZ
CAN
Canada without Quebec
CAZ
CAN
CA-NB
CAZ
CAN
CA-NF
CAZ
CAN
CA-NS
CAZ
CAN
CA-NT
CAZ
CAN
CA-NU
CAZ
CAN
CA-ON
CAZ
CAN
CA-PE
CAZ
CAN
CA-QC
CAZ
CAN
CA-SK
CAZ
CAN
CA-YK
CAZ
CAN
CD
SSA
WAF
CENTREL
EUR
CEU
CG
SSA
WAF
CH
NEU
WEU
CI
SSA
WAF
CL
LAM
RSAM
CM
SSA
WAF
CN
CHA
CHN
CN-AH
CHA
CHN
CN-BJ
CHA
CHN
CN-CQ
CHA
CHN
CN-CSG
CHA
CHN
CN-FJ
CHA
CHN
CN-GD
CHA
CHN
CN-GS
CHA
CHN
CN-GX
CHA
CHN
CN-GZ
CHA
CHN
CN-HA
CHA
CHN
CN-HB
CHA
CHN
CN-HE
CHA
CHN
CN-HL
CHA
CHN
CN-HN
CHA
CHN
CN-HU
CHA
CHN
CN-JL
CHA
CHN
CN-JS
CHA
CHN
CN-JX
CHA
CHN
CN-LN
CHA
CHN
CN-NM
CHA
CHN
CN-NX
CHA
CHN
CN-QH
CHA
CHN
CN-SA
CHA
CHN
CN-SC
CHA
CHN
CN-SD
CHA
CHN
CN-SGCC
CHA
CHN
CN-SH
CHA
CHN
CN-SX
CHA
CHN
CN-TJ
CHA
CHN
CN-XJ
CHA
CHN
CN-XZ
CHA
CHN
CN-YN
CHA
CHN
CN-ZJ
CHA
CHN
CO
LAM
RSAM
CR
LAM
RCAM
CU
LAM
RCAM
CW
LAM
RCAM
CY
EUR
CEU
CZ
EUR
CEU
DE
EUR
WEU
DK
EUR
WEU
DO
LAM
RCAM
DZ
MEA
NAF
EC
LAM
RSAM
EE
EUR
CEU
EG
MEA
NAF
ENTSO-E
EUR
WEU
ER
SSA
EAF
ES
EUR
WEU
ET
SSA
EAF
Europe without Austria
EUR
WEU
Europe without Switzerland
EUR
WEU
Europe without Switzerland and Austria
EUR
WEU
Europe, without Russia and Turkey
EUR
WEU
FI
EUR
WEU
FR
EUR
WEU
GA
SSA
WAF
GB
EUR
WEU
GE
REF
RUS
GH
SSA
WAF
GI
EUR
WEU
GLO
World
World
GR
EUR
WEU
GT
LAM
RCAM
HK
CHA
CHN
HN
LAM
RCAM
HR
EUR
CEU
HT
LAM
RCAM
HU
EUR
CEU
IAI Area, Africa
SSA
RSAF
IAI Area, Asia, without China and GCC
OAS
SEAS
IAI Area, EU27 & EFTA
EUR
WEU
IAI Area, Gulf Cooperation Council
MEA
ME
IAI Area, North America
USA
USA
IAI Area, Russia & RER w/o EU27 & EFTA
REF
RUS
IAI Area, South America
LAM
RSAM
ID
OAS
INDO
IE
EUR
WEU
IL
MEA
ME
IN
IND
INDIA
IN-AP
IND
INDIA
IN-AR
IND
INDIA
IN-AS
IND
INDIA
IN-BR
IND
INDIA
IN-CT
IND
INDIA
IN-DL
IND
INDIA
IN-Eastern grid
IND
INDIA
IN-GA
IND
INDIA
IN-GJ
IND
INDIA
IN-HP
IND
INDIA
IN-HR
IND
INDIA
IN-JH
IND
INDIA
IN-JK
IND
INDIA
IN-KA
IND
INDIA
IN-KL
IND
INDIA
IN-MH
IND
INDIA
IN-ML
IND
INDIA
IN-MN
IND
INDIA
IN-MP
IND
INDIA
IN-NL
IND
INDIA
IN-North-eastern grid
IND
INDIA
IN-Northern grid
IND
INDIA
IN-OR
IND
INDIA
IN-PB
IND
INDIA
IN-PY
IND
INDIA
IN-RJ
IND
INDIA
IN-SK
IND
INDIA
IN-Southern grid
IND
INDIA
IN-TN
IND
INDIA
IN-TR
IND
INDIA
IN-UP
IND
INDIA
IN-UT
IND
INDIA
IN-WB
IND
INDIA
IN-Western grid
IND
INDIA
IQ
MEA
ME
IR
MEA
ME
IS
NEU
WEU
IT
EUR
WEU
JM
LAM
RCAM
JO
MEA
ME
JP
JPN
JAP
KE
SSA
EAF
KG
REF
STAN
KH
OAS
SEAS
KP
OAS
KOR
KR
OAS
KOR
KW
MEA
ME
KZ
REF
STAN
LB
MEA
ME
LK
OAS
RSAS
LT
EUR
CEU
LU
EUR
WEU
LV
EUR
CEU
LY
MEA
NAF
MA
MEA
NAF
MD
REF
UKR
ME
NEU
ME
MG
SSA
EAF
MK
NEU
CEU
MM
OAS
SEAS
MN
OAS
CHN
MT
EUR
WEU
MU
SSA
EAF
MX
LAM
MEX
MY
OAS
SEAS
MZ
SSA
RSAF
NA
SSA
RSAF
NE
SSA
WAF
NG
SSA
WAF
NI
LAM
RCAM
NL
EUR
WEU
NO
NEU
WEU
NORDEL
NEU
WEU
North America without Quebec
USA
USA
NP
OAS
RSAS
NZ
CAZ
OCE
OCE
CAZ
OCE
OM
MEA
ME
PA
LAM
RCAM
PE
LAM
RSAM
PG
OAS
INDO
PH
OAS
SEAS
PK
OAS
RSAS
PL
EUR
CEU
PT
EUR
WEU
PY
LAM
RSAM
QA
MEA
ME
RAF
SSA
RSAF
RAS
CHA
CHN
RER
EUR
WEU
RER w/o CH+DE
EUR
WEU
RER w/o DE+NL+RU
EUR
WEU
RER w/o RU
EUR
WEU
RLA
LAM
RSAM
RME
MEA
ME
RNA
USA
USA
RO
EUR
CEU
RoW
World
World
RS
NEU
CEU
RU
REF
RUS
RW
SSA
EAF
SA
MEA
ME
SAS
IND
INDIA
SD
MEA
EAF
SE
EUR
WEU
SG
OAS
SEAS
SI
EUR
CEU
SK
EUR
CEU
SN
SSA
WAF
SS
SSA
EAF
SV
LAM
RCAM
SY
MEA
ME
TG
SSA
WAF
TH
OAS
SEAS
TJ
REF
STAN
TM
REF
STAN
TN
MEA
NAF
TR
MEA
TUR
TT
LAM
RCAM
TW
CHA
CHN
TZ
SSA
RSAF
UA
REF
UKR
UCTE
EUR
WEU
UCTE without Germany
EUR
WEU
UN-OCEANIA
CAZ
OCE
UN-SEASIA
OAS
SEAS
US
USA
USA
US-ASCC
USA
USA
US-HICC
USA
USA
US-MRO
USA
USA
US-NPCC
USA
USA
US-PR
USA
USA
US-RFC
USA
USA
US-SERC
USA
USA
US-TRE
USA
USA
US-WECC
USA
USA
UY
LAM
RSAM
UZ
REF
STAN
VE
LAM
RSAM
VN
OAS
SEAS
WECC
USA
USA
WEU
EUR
WEU
XK
EUR
CEU
YE
MEA
ME
ZA
SSA
SAF
ZM
SSA
RSAF
ZW
SSA
RSAF
Regionalization
Several of the integration steps described above involve the regionalization of datasets. It is the case, for example, when introducing datasets representing a process for each of the IAM regions. In such case, the datasets are regionalized by selecting the most representative suppliers of inputs for each region. If a dataset in a specific IAM region requires tap water, for example, the regionalization process will select the most representative water suppliers in that region.
If more than one supplier is available, the regionalization process will allocated a supply share to each candidate supplier based on their respective production volume. If no adequate supplier is found for a given region, the regionalization process will select all the existing suppliers and allocate a supply share to each supplier based on their respective production volume.
Here is the decision tree followed:
Decision Tree for Processing Datasets
The process begins with a dataset that requires processing.
Decision: Is the Exchange in Cache?
Yes
Use
process_cached_exchange()
.Retrieve cached data.
Update
new_exchanges
with cached data.
No
Use
process_uncached_exchange()
.None
Print a warning and return.
One
Use
handle_single_possible_dataset()
.Use the single matched dataset.
Update
new_exchanges
with this dataset information.
Multiple
Use
handle_multiple_possible_datasets()
.Yes
Use the matched dataset location.
No
Use
process_complex_matching_and_allocation()
.IAM Region
Use
handle_iam_region()
.Match IAM region to ecoinvent locations.
Update
new_exchanges
with IAM region-specific data.Cache the new entry.
Global (‘GLO’, ‘RoW’, ‘World’)
Use
handle_global_and_row_scenarios()
.Allocate inputs for global datasets.
Update
new_exchanges
with global data.Cache the new entry.
Others
Perform GIS matching.
Determine intersecting locations with GIS.
Allocate inputs based on GIS matches.
Update
new_exchanges
with GIS-specific data.Cache the new entry.
Final Steps
If no match is found, use
handle_default_option()
.Integrate new exchanges into the dataset.
GAINS emission factors
Run
from premise import *
import brightway2 as bw
bw.projects.set_current("my_project)
ndb = NewDatabase(
scenarios=[
{"model":"remind", "pathway":"SSP2-Base", "year":2028}
],
source_db="ecoinvent 3.7 cutoff",
source_version="3.7.1",
key='xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
)
ndb.update("emissions")
When using update(“emissions”), emission factors from the GAINS-EU and GAINS-IAM models are used to scale non-CO2 emissions in various datasets.
The emission factors are available under https://github.com/polca/premise/tree/master/premise/data/GAINS_emission_factors
Emission factors from GAINS-EU are applied to activities in European countries. Emission factors from GAINS-IAM are applied to activities in non-European countries, or to European activities if an emission facor from GAINS-EU has not been applied first.
Emission factors are specific to:
an activity type,
a year,
a country (for GAINS-EU, otherwise a region),
a fuel type,
a technology type,
and a scenario.
The mapping between GAINS and ecoinvent activities is available under the following file: https://github.com/polca/premise/blob/master/premise/data/GAINS_emission_factors/gains_ecoinvent_sectoral_mapping.yaml
The table below shows the mapping between ecoinvent and GAINS emission flows.
ecoinvent species |
GAINS species |
---|---|
Sulfur dioxide |
SO2 |
Sulfur oxides |
SO2 |
Carbon monoxide, fossil |
CO |
Carbon monoxide, non-fossil |
CO |
Carbon monoxide, from soil or biomass stock |
CO |
Nitrogen oxides |
NOx |
Ammonia |
NH3 |
NMVOC, non-methane volatile organic compounds, unspecified origin |
VOC |
VOC, volatile organic compounds, unspecified origin |
VOC |
Methane |
CH4 |
Methane, fossil |
CH4 |
Methane, non-fossil |
CH4 |
Methane, from soil or biomass stock |
CH4 |
Dinitrogen monoxide |
N2O |
Particulates, > 10 um |
PM10 |
Particulates, > 2.5 um, and < 10um |
PM25 |
Particulates, < 2.5 um |
PM1 |
We consider emission factors in ecoinvent as representative of the current situation. Hence, we calculate a scaling factor from the GAINS emission factors for the year of the scenario relative to the year 2020. note that premise prevents scaling factors to be inferior to 1 if the year is inferior to 2020. Inversely, scaling factors cannot be superior to 1 if the year is superior to 2020.
Two GAINS-IAM scenarios are available:
By default, the CLE scenario is used. To use the MFR scenario:
ndb = NewDatabase(
...
gains_scenario="MFR",
)
Finally, unlike GAINS-EU, GAINS-IAM uses IAM-like regions, not countries. The mapping between IAM regions and GAINS-IAM regions is available under the following file:
For questions related to GAINS modelling, please contact the respective GAINS team:
Logs
premise generates a spreadsheet report detailing changes made to the database for each scenario. The report is saved in the current working directory and is automatically generated after database export.
The report lists the datasets added, updated and emptied. It also gives a number of indicators relating to efficiency, emissions, etc. for each scenario.
Finally, it also contains a “Validation” tab that lists datasets which potentially present erroneous values. These datasets are to be checked by the user.
This report can also be generated manually using the generate_change_report() method.